por Manuel » Mar Ene 21, 2020 7:25 am
I like that bit of humour. ^_^
He posteado un par de preguntas a todos los candidatos, a ver qué dicen.
"I have 2 questions, that will also do to the other candidates.
1) How many votes do you think elections need for the futurue to be considered "legitimate". Please don't ask "the more the best". What I mean is: would you ask for a minimum quorum for the elections to be valid? I am thinking about past elections, where participation was very low when compared with the number of active players.
2) Regarding the World Cup. Have NAF coaches the right to know the detail about the loan the NAF made? I mean: the total amount, and perhaps general concepts where money was spent on (xxxx € in catering, xxxx € in dice, etc). Ideally I think the association should present the bills, but I have heard that some vendors wanted to keep privacy (which sounds quite strange, to be honest).
Thank you very much for your time and effort."
Básicamente, que a ver si creen que estas elecciones tienen que tener un mínimo quórum para considerarse válidas. Ha habido veces que con 300 votos ha quedado la cosa sentenciada y, francamente, para el total de cuentas que se suponen activas, para mí es un poco "crisis de democracia".
Por otro lado, les pregunto también por las cuentas del mundial. Que a ver si los usuarios tienen derecho a conocer cuánto se prestó y en concepto de qué.
